我認為本地商家大概是少數因 AI 而有大量能見度機會的產業(做得夠聰明的話)。你同意嗎?為什麼?
Thanks for doing this, Joy! Here's my question:
I think that local businesses are pretty much the only sector that may have lots of visibility opportunities due to AI (those that are smart enough). Would you agree or disagree with this, and why? THANKS AGAIN!
Joy 認為每個人在 AI 上都有很多機會;本地 SEO 的不同之處是,Google 上的本地搜尋並沒有大幅轉移。Sterling Sky 團隊替所有客戶追蹤名單(leads),還沒看過任何報告顯示外部 LLM 帶來超過總名單的 2%,其餘 98% 來自 Google。
基於這些觀察,Joy 認為 Google 會因為 Google 地圖,以及多年累積的使用者生成內容,持續壟斷本地搜尋,這個產品很難被競爭。
顯示 Joy 中英對照
I think everyone has lots of opportunities with AI. What I think is different about local SEO is that we're not seeing a huge shift away from local searches on Google. We track leads for all our clients and I have yet to see a report where external LLMs are bringing in more than 2% of their total leads. The other 98% is coming from Google. So I think Google will continue to have a monopoly on local search because of Google Maps. That product and all the years of user generated content they have is very hard to compete with.
我認為每個人在 AI 上都有很多機會。我覺得本地 SEO 不同的地方在於,我們並沒有看到本地搜尋大幅從 Google 轉移出去。我們為所有客戶追蹤名單(leads),我還沒看過任何一份報告顯示外部 LLM 帶來的名單超過總數的 2%,其餘 98% 都來自 Google。所以我認為 Google 會因為 Google 地圖而繼續壟斷本地搜尋。那個產品,加上他們多年累積的使用者生成內容,是很難與之競爭的。
服務據點頁因為 AI 模型的 query fan-out 而有不錯的成效。例如有人搜「flooring company los angeles」不會提到這家,但搜「flooring company van huys」就會提到,因為他們有專屬該地點的頁面,而且排進前三名。
I have seen good results with service location pages because of query fanout from AI models. So if someone searches for "flooring company los angeles", they do not get mentioned, but if they search for "flooring company van huys", they do get mentioned because they have a dedicated page for that location that ranks top 3.
這類頁面也確實從 LLM 拿到一些流量,只是量很小。
顯示 Joy 中英對照
Yeah, I have also seen these pages getting some traffic from LLMs, it's just really low volume.
對,我也看過這些頁面從 LLM 拿到一些流量,只是量真的很低。
量低正好,這就是你要建這些頁面的原因,它們的成功率很高。
Low volume is perfect, that is why you build them, they have a very high success rate.
